LEARN ABOUT MRI

MRI for Cancer Detection

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has become a cornerstone in oncology for its precision and effectiveness in cancer detection. This article delves into how MRI detects cancer, compares MRI with CT scans, and highlights the benefits of using MRI in oncology.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has become a cornerstone in cancer detection due to its ability to produce highly detailed images of soft tissue without exposing patients to ionising radiation. This makes MRI a safe and repeatable choice, especially for early detection and for populations needing frequent monitoring, such as those at high risk for certain cancers. The use of gadolinium-based contrast agents and multiparametric protocols, which combine T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted (DWI/ADC), and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) sequences, has established MRI as the gold standard for identifying and characterising tumours in the prostate and breast1,2.

Recent advancements have introduced whole-body diffusion MRI, enabling the rapid and radiation-free detection of metastatic disease throughout the body, rivalling PET/CT in sensitivity for many cancer types3. MRI’s superior soft-tissue contrast and functional imaging capabilities make it particularly effective for diagnosing cancer at early, potentially curable stages. As a result, MRI plays a crucial role in both initial diagnosis and ongoing assessment, supporting precise treatment planning and improved patient outcomes.

Learn more about MRI for Cancer Detection

Brain Cervical Spine Lung
Liver Pancreas Kidneys
Bone MRI Side-Effects

How MRI Works in Cancer Detection

The human body primarily comprises water, around 55-75 per cent4. Water's chemical composition consists of hydrogen and oxygen atoms. Inside each hydrogen atom resides a small particle called a proton. Protons have a positive electrical charge and are sensitive to magnetic fields5,6.

MRI machines use large, powerful magnets to generate a strong magnetic field around the patient7. When a person is placed inside the machine, this field causes the hydrogen atoms in their body to align in a particular direction.

The MRI machine then sends radio frequency (RF) pulses, temporarily disrupting the alignment of these hydrogen atoms. Once the RF pulses stop, the hydrogen atoms realign, releasing energy as radio waves picked up by the MRI scanner.

Since tissues contain varying amounts of water (and therefore hydrogen atoms) and release energy at different rates, the MRI scanner can differentiate between tissue types and produce high-resolution cross-sectional images8.

An MRI scanner typically has a large, cylindrical tube-like structure. This is where the patient lies during the imaging process. Inside the MRI are7:

  • The primary magnets: Usually, a superconducting magnet cooled to low temperatures using liquid helium.
  • Coils: Antennas that send radio waves and receive signals from the protons.

The MRI room typically has a control room where the technologist operates the machine. This area includes screens and buttons to control the MRI process and monitor the patient.

Computer and software systems control the MRI and radio wave pulses. These systems process the signals received from the coils and convert them into images.

Contrast vs. Non-Contrast MRI: The Role of Gadolinium

MRI scans can be performed with or without a special dye called gadolinium:

Contrast MRI (with gadolinium):

  • When used, gadolinium contrast is administered through an injection to highlight specific tissues or blood vessels. This is particularly helpful for detecting tumours, inflammation, or changes in blood supply, which are key indicators for cancers that may appear similar to normal tissue on standard scans9.
  • Gadolinium alters the MRI signals in areas where it accumulates (typically in places with leaky or abnormal blood vessels, such as tumours), making abnormal tissue stand out more clearly on the scan10.
  • Gadolinium is generally safe but may be avoided in patients with severe kidney problems due to a rare risk of complications.

Non-Contrast MRI (without gadolinium):

  • Non-contrast MRI is useful when functional information is sufficient, or when avoiding contrast is necessary, such as for patients with kidney impairment, allergies, or during pregnancy11.
  • Some cancers and many soft tissue masses can be characterised without contrast, especially using advanced sequences like diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), which detects how water moves in tissue12.

Types of MRI Scans Used in Cancer Detection

MRI in oncology leverages a range of sequences and techniques to improve the detection, characterisation, and staging of cancer. Each method provides unique tissue contrasts or functional information critical for accurate staging.

  • T1-weighted imaging provides anatomical detail with high resolution. It is useful for assessing fat and subacute haemorrhage, as well as evaluating post-contrast enhancement13.
  • T2-weighted imaging emphasises differences in water content, making it sensitive to oedema, cysts, and many tumours14. It also aids in highlighting abnormal tissue due to increased water content.
  • Short-Tau Inversion Recovery (STIR) suppresses fat signals, enhancing the detection of lesions within fat-rich tissues15. It is widely used in musculoskeletal and whole-body imaging for metastasis detection.
  • DWI and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) quantify the diffusion of water molecules in tissues16. Tumours often restrict diffusion, appearing bright on DWI and dark on ADC maps. This is particularly valuable for early tumour detection, assessment of aggressiveness, and distinguishing benign from malignant masses.
  • Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced (DCE) MRI involves rapid imaging after the injection of gadolinium to track the dynamics of the contrast agent17. It reveals tumour vascularity and permeability - hallmarks of malignancy. DCE is essential for breast, prostate, and other organ-specific imaging as part of multiparametric protocols.
  • MR Spectroscopy provides metabolic and biochemical profiles of tissues. It assists in distinguishing tumour recurrence from post-treatment changes and characterising tumour metabolism.
  • Whole-body DWI enables the detection of primary and metastatic tumours throughout the body without the use of ionising radiation18. It is especially powerful for cancer staging and treatment monitoring, showing high sensitivity for lymph node and bone metastases.

What Types of Cancer Can MRI Detect?

MRI is highly valued in oncology for its ability to detect and characterise a range of cancers across different organs with strong sensitivity, often outperforming other imaging techniques, especially in soft-tissue evaluation. Sensitivity varies by cancer type, MRI technique, and use of contrast agents, but advanced protocols achieve excellent diagnostic accuracy in many organs.

MRI Sensitivity by Organ/Cancer Type
Organ/Cancer Type Sensitivity Range (%) Details
Breast Cancer 85–100%19–21 Superior for dense breasts and high-risk patients; very sensitive for both invasive and in situ cancers.
Prostate Cancer 46–96%22 Multiparametric MRI is the standard for detecting clinically significant cancers.
Liver Cancer Up to 92.3%23 Gadolinium-enhanced MRI is particularly effective for early HCC.
Brain Tumours Up to 99.7%24 Sensitive for both primary brain tumours and metastases.
Kidney Cancer Up to 88.1%25 MRI is particularly effective at detecting kidney cancer when CT scans are not suitable or when more detailed images are required.
Cervical Spine Cancer Up to 100%26 MRI is considered the modality of choice for evaluating spinal tumours.
Lung Cancer Up to 100%27 Highest sensitivity for nodules ≥ 8–10 mm; effective for screening.
Colorectal Cancer Metastases Up to 97.8%28,29 Very accurate for detecting liver metastases from colorectal cancer.
Whole-body MRI for Metastases Up to 92%30 Useful for comprehensive cancer staging and evaluating metastatic disease.

Benign and Other Non-Cancerous Tumours Detectable by MRI

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a crucial modality for identifying benign tumours and distinguishing them from malignant lesions across organ systems. Its superior soft-tissue contrast, multiplanar capability, and versatility make it valuable in diagnosing and characterising non-cancerous masses. 

Anatomical Overview of Benign Tumours Detectable by MRI

Central Nervous System (CNS):

  • Meningioma
  • Schwannoma
  • Pituitary adenoma
  • Epidermoid/dermoid cyst
  • Low-grade glioma (some may be non-cancerous

MRI signs: Well-defined, smoothly marginated lesions; lack of significant surrounding swelling31,32.

Figure 1: Pineocytoma in a 35-year-old woman. Adapted from Source. Image obtained under the Creative Commons License.

Head & Neck:

  • Pleomorphic adenoma (salivary gland)
  • Juvenile angiofibroma (in adolescents)
  • Warthin’s tumour
  • Cervical lymphangioma and hemangioma (vascular malformations)
  • Benign thyroid nodule
  • Paraganglioma (may be benign)

MRI signs: Well-circumscribed, even (homogenous) signal, often hyperintense on T233.

Thorax:

  • Pulmonary hamartoma
  • Thymic cysts
  • Bronchogenic cyst
  • Lipoma (chest wall, mediastinum)

MRI signs: Homogenous fat signal (for lipomas), lack of invasion into surrounding structures34.

Abdomen & Pelvis: 

  • Hepatic hemangioma
  • Renal angiomyolipoma
  • Adrenal adenoma
  • Ovarian cystadenoma
  • Uterine fibroid (leiomyoma)
  • Pancreatic cystadenoma
  • Mesenteric/omental cyst

MRI signs: Characteristic signal properties (e.g., fat suppression for angiomyolipoma, vascular pooling for hemangioma), well-defined borders35,36.

Figure 2: A 42-year-old woman with a right adrenal adenoma (arrow). (A) T2-weighted imaging showed a hypointense mass; (B,C) T1-weighted imaging shows signal intensity loss within the mass. Adapted from Source. Image obtained under the Creative Commons License.

Musculoskeletal:

  • Lipoma
  • Fibromatosis (some forms)
  • Enchondroma
  • Osteoid osteoma
  • Giant cell tumour (can be locally aggressive)
  • Schwannoma/neurofibroma
  • Baker’s cyst (popliteal)

MRI signs: Well-defined margins, homogenous appearance, no cortical bone destruction, absence of soft tissue invasion37,38.

Paediatric:

  • Lymphangioma & hemangioma (head and neck, body wall)
  • Teratome (sacrococcygeal, mediastinal, cervical)
  • Juvenile angiofibroma (nasopharynx)
  • Simple cystic lesions (renal, liver, ovarian, splenic)
  • Lipoblastoma

MRI is especially useful in children to avoid ionising radiation and to better characterise tissue properties and anatomical relations33,36,39.

“Red-Flag” MRI Signs That Warrant Biopsy

Certain MRI features suggest a higher risk of malignancy (“red flags”) that should prompt histopathological confirmation via biopsy, even for lesions that might otherwise appear benign:

  • Deep location: Lesions located deep to the fascia have a higher malignant potential, although this is not always a standalone criterion37.
  • Large size: Tumours >5 cm are suspicious, particularly if growing quickly40.
  • Heterogeneous signal: Marked heterogeneity on T2-weighted images suggests necrosis, haemorrhage, or aggressive growth.
  • Irregular/poorly defined margins: Malignant tumors are more likely to have jagged or infiltrative borders compared to benign lesions, which have smooth, well-demarcated edges41.
  • Invasion: Infiltration of adjacent structures, soft tissue, bone, neurovascular involvement, or evidence of metastatic spread42.
  • Atypical enhancement: Nodular, ring, or patchy contrast enhancement patterns raise suspicion.
  • Associated symptoms: Neurological deficits (for CNS lesions), unexplained pain, or systemic symptoms can warrant urgent evaluation43.

Accuracy of MRI in Detecting Cancer and Its Limitations

As shown above, MRI demonstrates high sensitivity and moderate to high specificity in cancer detection, which varies by tumor type and anatomical region. MRI is widely used for prostate cancer, where it efficiently helps distinguish clinically significant tumors44. In breast cancer, contrast-enhanced MRI serves as a reliable tool, often able to detect malignancies that may be subtle or inconspicuous using other modalities45

In the evaluation of brain and head and neck tumors, MRI proves effective in revealing malignant lesions, with its accuracy influenced by both the specific imaging techniques employed and the site involved46. The diagnostic accuracy for differentiating tumour progression from treatment effects or benign conditions can be further enhanced by using a combination of multiple MRI techniques.

False-Negative Hot-Spots

Certain lesions are prone to false negatives or underdiagnosis on MRI, such as:

  • Micronodules: Very small lesions, especially in the lungs, are often missed due to limited spatial resolution and respiratory movement47,48.
  • Mucinous tumours: Tumours with a high water content or mucinous composition (e.g., mucinous adenocarcinomas) may not exhibit typical MRI signal changes, leading to misinterpretation or a missed diagnosis49.
  • Low cellularity/metabolically inactive tumors: These may not exhibit the expected enhancement or signal restriction, especially in the early stages or small size.

Major Limitations

  • Motion artefacts: Patient movement, respiration, and cardiac motion can blur images, reducing lesion detectability, especially in abdominal, thoracic, and pediatric applications50. Motion artefacts are particularly problematic in uncooperative patients or children.
  • Metal implants: Orthopedic hardware, dental instruments, and other metallic implants can produce marked artefacts, signal voids, distortion, or “black holes”, which may obscure lesions, especially near the implant site51. Some artifacts cannot be fully compensated, limiting MRI’s diagnostic value in those regions.
  • Claustrophobia: MRI requires patients to remain still in a closed bore, which can provoke anxiety or claustrophobia, sometimes making completion of the scan impossible without sedation or alternative imaging.

This can hinder throughput and limit MRI availability for certain populations.

MRI vs. Other Cancer Tests

Cancer Diagnostic Tests Comparison
Test Strengths Weaknesses Radiation Dose (mSv)
MRI High soft tissue contrast, excellent for CNS, pelvic, soft tissue & some liver/prostate cancers; safe in pregnancy. Can be slow, sensitive to motion; issues with metal implants; not ideal for lung/colon; claustrophobia in some patients. 0 (no ionising radiation).
CT Fast and widely available; particularly effective for chest, abdomen, and bone cancers; also excellent for lung, liver, and bowel cancers. Uses ionising radiation; less contrast in soft tissues than MRI; not ideal for CNS/prostate/uterus. 2–20 (varies by scan type).
PET-CT Detects metabolic activity, helpful for staging, recurrence, and treatment response; high accuracy in many cancers. High radiation dose; expensive; limited sensitivity for some tumours (e.g., low metabolic activity); not suited for all cancers. 12–25.
Ultrasound No radiation; low cost; real-time imaging; good for abdominal, pelvic, thyroid, and some breast cancers; safe in pregnancy. Operator dependent; limited depth/tissue characterization; not ideal for deep, bone, or gas-containing structures. 0 (no ionising radiation).
Mammography Best for breast cancer screening; can detect microcalcifications; standardized technique. Radiation exposure; reduced accuracy in dense breasts or younger women; possible overdiagnosis. 0.4 per scan.
Biopsy Gold standard for diagnosis; provides histology and molecular info; essential for definitive diagnosis. Invasive; risk of complications; not feasible for all lesions; sampling error possible. 0 (unless image-guided by CT).
Liquid Biopsy Non-invasive (blood-based); detects genetic markers; allows for repeated, real-time monitoring. Less robust than tissue for solid lesions; sampling error possible; tumour localization limited for early/small/heterogeneous tumours; mainly adjunct. 0 (no ionising radiation).

Safety, Contra-Indications & Contrast Agents

Implants & Devices: MR Safe vs. Conditional

  • MR Safe: Objects made of non-conducting, non-metallic, non-magnetic material that pose no additional risk in the MR environment.
  • MR Conditional: Implants/devices that are compatible only under specific conditions (e.g., specific scanner field strength, position, or waiting period post-implantation). These conditions must be precisely followed, often depending on the implant's material and its interaction with the MRI magnetic field.
  • MR Unsafe: Items known to pose hazards in any MR environment (e.g., ferromagnetic objects).

Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents (GBCS) Risks

  • Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis (NSF): Rare, serious risk for patients with severely impaired renal function (eGFR < 30mL/min).
  • Pregnancy: Use only if absolutely essential; animal studies show potential risks, and some human data suggest a possible increased risk of stillbirth or neonatal death, but not major congenital anomalies52. In general, alternative imaging is preferred during pregnancy.
  • Allergy/Anaphylaxis: Mild reactions, such as nausea or hives, are possible; severe allergic reactions are very rare. GBCAs are not contraindicated in patients with mild allergies, but increased vigilance is required.

Claustrophobia & Acoustic Noise Mitigation

  • Mitigation strategies include short-bore, open MRI designs and patient-centric approaches, which significantly reduce claustrophobic reactions compared to conventional scanners.

If you want to read more about the potential side effects from MRI and how these can be combated, read our article here.

Preparing for Your MRI

Here are a few tips to help you prepare for your MRI53:

  • Take your usual medications and eat normally, unless instructed to fast for specific MRI protocols. Fasting is not always required however54
  • Avoid heavy caffeine intake and stay hydrated.
  • Inform staff about any metal implants or devices, and bring safety cards for “MR-Conditional” implants, such as pacemakers or aneurysm clips.
  • Remove all metal items, including jewellery, hairpins, dental plates, and transdermal patches with foil, to prevent image distortion.
  • Bring your referral, prior images, and insurance pre-authorisation to avoid delays.
  • Wear comfortable, metal-free clothing; ask about earplugs, music, or mirror goggles if you’re claustrophobic.
  • If contrast is planned, fast for 4–6 hours prior to the procedure. Inform staff about any kidney issues or past reactions to contrast agents, as safer alternatives may be available.
  • Arrange an escort home if you need sedation for claustrophobia.

During & After Your MRI

Upon arrival for your MRI, you will need to check in and complete a screening form. This will allow you to confirm the presence of implants, allergies, and whether you might need any anxiety medication.

During the scan, you will lie down on a sliding table. A dedicated surface or phased-array coil is typically placed over the limb or region of interest55. The scan typically lasts 30-45 minutes of actual “table time”, during which the technician may acquire multiple sequences (settings). You may be asked to hold your breath for short periods during the scan to minimise motion and improve image clarity.

You’ll hear a series of loud knocking or tapping sounds as the MRI machine works. This is completely normal. The scan usually takes about 20 to 45 minutes, and you’ll be offered earplugs or headphones to make the experience more comfortable. 

You’ll stay in touch with the team via a two-way intercom and a squeeze bulb, allowing you to communicate or pause the scan if needed. If contrast is required, it’s injected halfway through, possibly causing a brief cool sensation. After the final sequence, the coil is removed, and you’re free to go. 

After the MRI scan, you will be free to go home and continue with your day without any precautions56. If you received a sedative, you will need another person to pick you up. You will also not be able to drive, consume alcohol, or operate heavy machinery 24 hours after the sedative. 

A team of experts will review your results and determine whether a follow-up is necessary, recommending the appropriate treatment if needed. If abnormalities are found, you may undergo ongoing monitoring every 2-3 months to track recurrence. You can receive support in the form of counselling and advice on how to handle aspects like claustrophobia. 

If you have a scan with us here at Ezra, you will receive your report within five to seven days and have the option to discuss it with a medical practitioner. You can also access your scan images through the online portal.

Who Should Consider an MRI Scan?

High-Risk Screening Cohorts (BRCA, Lynch, HCC Surveillance)

Individuals with high-risk genetic profiles such as BRCA1/2 mutations or Lynch syndrome are recommended for regular MRI screening because of their significantly increased lifetime cancer risk. For example, annual breast MRI screening starting at age 25 is recommended for BRCA mutation carriers, as it enhances early cancer detection and improves survival rates57,58

MRI colonography or colonoscopy is indicated for Lynch syndrome, and MRI is increasingly utilised for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance in populations at risk for liver disease, thanks to its superior sensitivity for detecting early-stage lesions compared to ultrasound59,60.

Symptom-Driven Diagnostic Triggers

Symptom-driven MRI is warranted when clinical presentation or findings suggest conditions that require high-contrast, multiplanar imaging, such as unexplained neurological deficits, refractory headaches, spinal pain, or ambiguous mass lesions61. Correlating imaging findings with patient-reported symptoms substantially increases diagnostic accuracy, especially in cases with non-specific or overlapping clinical features.

Special Situations: Paediatrics (Sedation, Pregnancy, Renal Failure)

MRI is preferred in children for complex or unclear diagnoses, but sedation is often necessary to ensure immobility, demanding specialised monitoring due to higher risks of respiratory and cardiovascular complications in the MRI setting62. During pregnancy, MRI is considered safe after the first trimester and is reserved for cases where a diagnosis will significantly impact management, with contrast usage minimised unless absolutely necessary63. In patients with renal failure, non-contrast MRI does not pose additional risk, but gadolinium-based contrast should be avoided or used with caution due to potential risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis.

Benefits of Early Cancer Detection with MRI

Early detection of cancer with MRI leads to significantly better patient outcomes, as cancers identified at an early stage are more likely to be smaller, node-negative, and have higher survival rates compared to those found later. Studies demonstrate that high-risk cohorts undergoing routine MRI screening achieve detection of stage 0 or 1 tumours in over 90 per cent of cases, reducing the need for extensive, aggressive treatment and increasing the likelihood of breast-conserving therapy or less intensive interventions64–66

Early diagnosis not only enhances survival, but also preserves quality of life by minimizing physical and psychological impacts associated with more advanced disease and harsher treatments. 

MRI Scan Cost

Ezra’s Full Body Plus MRI scan in the UK costs £2,695 and is currently available at their partner clinic in Marylebone, London, with more locations planned in the future. No referral is required, so you can book your scan directly without consulting a GP or specialist first. Most people pay out-of-pocket, as insurance typically does not cover self-referred scans, but you may be able to seek reimbursement depending on your policy. 

Emerging Technologies

  • AI Triage: Artificial intelligence tools are increasingly used to triage MRI scans, efficiently flagging abnormal findings to streamline diagnostic workflows and reduce radiologist workload67,68. Early studies confirm that these systems maintain high sensitivity and specificity for critical pathologies.
  • Ultra-High-Field 7T MRI: This offers significantly improved spatial and contrast resolution, enabling enhanced visualisation of subtle anatomical, functional, and metabolic abnormalities in the brain and joints, with particular benefits for diagnosing complex neurologic disorders and early detection of disease processes69,70.
  • Whole-Body MRI Screening Trials: Whole-body MRI screening, particularly in high-risk cohorts, has demonstrated high specificity and respectable sensitivity for early cancer detection, leading to timely interventions for curable cancers30,71. However, some studies have highlighted limitations, including false positives and the need for adjunctive modalities in certain malignancies.

Understanding Your MRI Results

How Radiology Reports Are Structured

Radiology reports generally have a standardised format to guide referring doctors and patients:

  • Findings: Provides a detailed, objective description of what the radiologist sees on the images, such as anatomical structures, abnormalities, or disease features. This section employs technical language and provides detailed descriptions of each relevant observation.
  • Impression: Summarises the key findings and offers an expert interpretation, including the most likely diagnosis or differential diagnoses. This section is designed to be clear and actionable for treatment planning and is often the most crucial part for both patients and doctors.
  • RADS Lexicons: Certain standardised systems, such as BI-RADS (for breast imaging) or O-RADS (for ovarian/adnexal imaging), are used to categorise findings and indicate the likelihood of disease. These lexicons ensure uniform reporting and guide management decisions.

Questions to Ask Your Radiologist or Oncologist

  • What are the most important findings in my MRI report?
  • Can you explain the impression section in non-technical terms?
  • What is my RADS category or risk score, and what does it mean for my care?
  • Are there any abnormal results that need further testing or follow-up?
  • How do these findings change my diagnosis or treatment plan?
  • Are any additional scans, biopsies, or specialist consultations recommended?
  • How reliable are the MRI findings? Could there be false positives/negatives?
  • What symptoms or changes should I watch for going forward?

These questions will help you understand your results, clarify uncertainties, and participate in informed decision-making about your next steps.

Ezra provides a radiologist-reviewed report in a non-technical and easy-to-understand format on your dashboard.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can an MRI detect cancer anywhere in the body?

MRI can detect cancer in many areas, especially soft tissues and organs, but it is not always the best test for every type of cancer and may miss smaller or certain types of tumours.

Can MRI cause cancer?

MRI does not use ionising radiation and has not been shown to cause cancer, making it one of the safest imaging techniques available.

Can you tell if a tumour is cancerous from an MRI?

An MRI can often distinguish between benign and malignant tumours based on certain imaging features, but a definite cancer diagnosis usually requires a biopsy or additional tests.

What colour does cancer show up on MRI?

Cancerous tissue typically appears as a white or bright area compared to the surrounding tissue on standard black-and-white MRI scans, but contrast and colour can vary depending on scan settings or use of special dyes.

Can MRI results be seen immediately?

MRI results are not available immediately after the scan; images must be reviewed by a radiologist, and the final report is usually provided to your doctor within a few hours to a couple of days, unless it is an emergency.

Key Takeaways

  • Radiation-Free Precision: MRI uses powerful magnets and radio waves instead of ionising radiation, making it safe for repeated scans and especially suitable for imaging sensitive populations. Its ability to deliver high-contrast, detailed images of soft tissues surpasses many other modalities, revealing cancers that may remain hidden on X-ray or CT scans.
  • Multiparametric Edge: By integrating multiple imaging sequences, such as T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted (ADC), and contrast-enhanced MRI, multiparametric MRI increases detection rates for challenging cancers in organs like the breast, prostate, brain, liver, and bones. This combination enables accurate tumour characterisation at early stages, which is crucial for curative treatment and better patient outcomes.
  • Future-Proof Reach: Advances like whole-body diffusion MRI empower clinicians to detect and stage metastatic disease throughout the body in a single scan. The integration of AI-powered radiomics enables automated detection, risk stratification, and personalised therapy planning, pushing MRI to the forefront of scalable, precision oncology.

MRI stands out for its safety, diagnostic performance in soft tissue tumours, and adaptability to emerging technologies, making it a cornerstone of modern and future cancer care.

Our MRI scan is designed to help detect cancer early without harmful radiation.
Book Scan Icon
It's quick and easy to book
Schedule your scan online at one of our locations nationwide.
Complete Scan Icon
Medical questionnaire
Fill out a quick online form to let us know about your medical history.
Get Scanned
Get your Ezra Full Body MRI Scan — it takes as little as 30 minutes and screens for potential cancer in up to 13 organs and 500+ conditions.
Walk Icon
A bespoke medical report
Your images are reviewed by board certified radiologists and our Clinical Team will deliver your Ezra Report within 5-7 days.

References

1. Ghai S, Haider MA. Multiparametric-MRI in diagnosis of prostate cancer. Indian J Urol. 2015;31(3):194-201. doi:10.4103/0970-1591.159606

2. Gao Y, Reig B, Heacock L, et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Screening of Breast Cancer. Radiol Clin North Am. 2021;59(1):85-98. doi:10.1016/j.rcl.2020.09.004

3. Sommer G, Wiese M, Winter L, et al. Preoperative staging of non-small-cell lung cancer: comparison of whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Eur Radiol. 2012;22(12):2859-2867. doi:10.1007/s00330-012-2542-y

4. Popkin BM, D’Anci KE, Rosenberg IH. Water, Hydration and Health. Nutr Rev. 2010;68(8):439-458. doi:10.1111/j.1753-4887.2010.00304.x

5. Cancer Research UK. MRI scan. Accessed February 12, 2025. https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/tests-and-scans/mri-scan

6. DOE Explains...Protons. Energy.gov. Accessed March 14, 2025. https://www.energy.gov/science/doe-explainsprotons

7. Berger A. Magnetic resonance imaging. BMJ. 2002;324(7328):35.

8. Doria JJ. A Primer on Imaging. Alcohol Health Res World. 1995;19(4):261-265.

9. Amini B, Murphy WA, Haygood TM, et al. Gadolinium-based Contrast Agents Improve Detection of Recurrent Soft-Tissue Sarcoma at MRI. Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2020;2(2):e190046. doi:10.1148/rycan.2020190046

10. Grahl S, Bussas M, Pongratz V, et al. T1-Weighted Intensity Increase After a Single Administration of a Linear Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent in Multiple Sclerosis. Clin Neuroradiol. 2021;31(1):235-243. doi:10.1007/s00062-020-00882-6

11. Raj H, Lal H, Rustagi S, et al. Biparametric magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool for differentiating RCC and renal pseudotumor in CKD patients. Urologia. 2025;92(2):201-208. doi:10.1177/03915603241276738

12. Ahlawat S, Fayad LM. Diffusion weighted imaging demystified: the technique and potential clinical applications for soft tissue imaging. Skeletal Radiol. 2018;47(3):313-328. doi:10.1007/s00256-017-2822-3

13. Ogris K, Petrovic A, Scheicher S, et al. Detection and volume estimation of artificial hematomas in the subcutaneous fatty tissue: comparison of different MR sequences at 3.0 T. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2017;13(2):135-144. doi:10.1007/s12024-017-9847-8

14. Santucci D, Faiella E, Cordelli E, et al. The Impact of Tumor Edema on T2-Weighted 3T-MRI Invasive Breast Cancer Histological Characterization: A Pilot Radiomics Study. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(18):4635. doi:10.3390/cancers13184635

15. Mürtz P, Sprinkart AM, Block W, et al. Combined diffusion and perfusion index maps from simplified intravoxel incoherent motion imaging enable visual assessment of breast lesions. Sci Rep. 2025;15:17388. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-01984-2

16. Pinker K, Moy L, Sutton EJ, et al. Diffusion-weighted Imaging with Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Mapping for Breast Cancer Detection as a Stand-Alone-Parameter: Comparison with Dynamic Contrast-enhanced and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Invest Radiol. 2018;53(10):587-595. doi:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000465

17. Sun SY, Ding Y, Li Z, et al. Multiparameter MRI Model With DCE-MRI, DWI, and Synthetic MRI Improves the Diagnostic Performance of BI-RADS 4 Lesions. Front Oncol. 2021;11:699127. doi:10.3389/fonc.2021.699127

18. Koh DM, Blackledge M, Padhani AR, et al. Whole-Body Diffusion-Weighted MRI: Tips, Tricks, and Pitfalls. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2012;199(2):252-262. doi:10.2214/AJR.11.7866

19. Chen H long, Zhou J qun, Chen Q, et al. Comparison of the sensitivity of mammography, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging and combinations of these imaging modalities for the detection of small (≤2 cm) breast cancer. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021;100(26):e26531. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000026531

20. Virostko J, Hainline A, Kang H, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for predicting the response of locally advanced breast cancer to neoadjuvant therapy: a meta-analysis. J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2018;5(1):011011. doi:10.1117/1.JMI.5.1.011011

21. Lord SJ, Lei W, Craft P, et al. A systematic review of the effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as an addition to mammography and ultrasound in screening young women at high risk of breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2007;43(13):1905-1917. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2007.06.007

22. Ghafoori M, Alavi M, Aliyari Ghasabeh M. MRI in Prostate Cancer. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2013;15(12):e16620. doi:10.5812/ircmj.16620

23. Emir SN, Gürsu M, Bulut SSD. Evaluating the potential of abbreviated MRI protocols for liver metastasis detection: a study in colorectal cancer patients. Pol J Radiol. 2025;90:e19-e25. doi:10.5114/pjr/196906

24. Deike-Hofmann K, Thünemann D, Breckwoldt MO, et al. Sensitivity of different MRI sequences in the early detection of melanoma brain metastases. PLoS One. 2018;13(3):e0193946. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0193946

25. Kim JH, Sun HY, Hwang J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of small renal masses in real practice: sensitivity and specificity according to subjective radiologic interpretation. World J Surg Oncol. 2016;14:260. doi:10.1186/s12957-016-1017-z

26. Petrén-Mallmin M, Andréasson I, Nyman R, et al. Detection of breast cancer metastases in the cervical spine. Acta Radiol. 1993;34(6):543-548.

27. Feng H, Shi G, Liu H, et al. The Application and Value of 3T Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Display of Pulmonary Nodules. Front Oncol. 2022;12:844514. doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.844514

28. Macera A, Lario C, Petracchini M, et al. Staging of colorectal liver metastases after preoperative chemotherapy. Diffusion-weighted imaging in combination with Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI sequences increases sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(3):739-747. doi:10.1007/s00330-012-2658-0

29. Dresen RC, De Vuysere S, De Keyzer F, et al. Whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI for operability assessment in patients with colorectal cancer and peritoneal metastases. Cancer Imaging. 2019;19:1. doi:10.1186/s40644-018-0187-z

30. Que FVF, Ishak NDB, Li ST, et al. Utility of Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging Surveillance in Children and Adults With Cancer Predisposition Syndromes: A Retrospective Study. JCO Precis Oncol. 2025;9:e2400642. doi:10.1200/PO-24-00642

31. Non-cancerous (benign) brain tumours. nhs.uk. March 4, 2025. Accessed July 22, 2025. https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/non-cancerous-benign-brain-tumours/

32. Tests to diagnose brain tumours. Accessed July 22, 2025. https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/brain-tumours/getting-diagnosed/what-are-the-tests

33. Lloyd C, McHugh K. The role of radiology in head and neck tumours in children. Cancer Imaging. 2010;10(1):49-61. doi:10.1102/1470-7330.2010.0003

34. Turek Ł, Sadowski M, Kurzawski J, et al. A 64-Year-Old Woman with Imaging Features Consistent with a Posterior Intrapericardial Lipoma and 5-Year Imaging Follow-Up. Am J Case Rep. 2021;22:e934500-1-e934500-5. doi:10.12659/AJCR.934500

35. Benign Soft Tissue Tumors. Cleveland Clinic. Accessed July 23, 2025. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/16778-benign-soft-tissue-tumors

36. Alamo L, Beck-Popovic M, Gudinchet F, et al. Congenital tumors: imaging when life just begins. Insights Imaging. 2011;2(3):297-308. doi:10.1007/s13244-011-0073-8

37. Chung WJ, Chung HW, Shin MJ, et al. MRI to differentiate benign from malignant soft-tissue tumours of the extremities: a simplified systematic imaging approach using depth, size and heterogeneity of signal intensity. Br J Radiol. 2012;85(1018):e831-e836. doi:10.1259/bjr/27487871

38. Bone Tumours. TeachMeSurgery. Accessed July 23, 2025. https://teachmesurgery.com/orthopaedic/principles/bone-tumours/

39. Canale S, Vilcot L, Ammari S, et al. Whole body MRI in paediatric oncology. Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging. 2014;95(6):541-550. doi:10.1016/j.diii.2013.11.002

40. Malherbe F, Nel D, Molabe H, et al. Palpable breast lumps: An age-based approach to evaluation and diagnosis. S Afr Fam Pract (2004). 2022;64(1):5571. doi:10.4102/safp.v64i1.5571

41. Salom M, Balacó I. How to distinguish a benign from a malignant tumour in children and when should a biopsy be done and by whom. EFORT Open Rev. 2024;9(5):393-402. doi:10.1530/EOR-24-0031

42. Henschke N, Maher CG, Ostelo RW, et al. Red flags to screen for malignancy in patients with low‐back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013(2):CD008686. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008686.pub2

43. Common Warning Signs of Brain Tumors. Accessed July 23, 2025. https://www.aaroncohen-gadol.com/en/patients/brain-tumor/natural-history/en/patients/brain-tumor/natural-history/warning-signs

44. Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet. 2017;389(10071):815-822. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1

45. Zhou B, He W, Kaur J, et al. Meta-Analysis of Abbreviated MRI Scanning Reveals a High Specificity and Sensitivity in Detecting Breast Cancer. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2023;50(6):115. doi:10.31083/j.ceog5006115

46. Teunissen WHT, Govaerts CW, Kramer MCA, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI techniques for treatment response evaluation in patients with brain metastasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiother Oncol. 2022;177:121-133. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2022.10.026

47. Gould MK, Donington J, Lynch WR, et al. Evaluation of Individuals With Pulmonary Nodules: When Is It Lung Cancer? Chest. 2013;143(5 Suppl):e93S-e120S. doi:10.1378/chest.12-2351

48. Sivathapandi T, Amalchandran J, Takalkar A, et al. Molecular Imaging of Lung and Pleural Tumors. In: Hall LT, ed. Molecular Imaging and Therapy. Exon Publications; 2023. Accessed July 23, 2025. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK599133/

49. Pandey A, Ghosh S, Prajapati P, et al. Pearls and Pitfalls in Applying PI-RADS 2. Journal of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology. 2024;07(03):183-202. doi:10.1055/s-0043-1778636

50. Krupa K, Bekiesińska-Figatowska M. Artifacts in Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Pol J Radiol. 2015;80:93-106. doi:10.12659/PJR.892628

51. Radzi S, Cowin G, Robinson M, et al. Metal artifacts from titanium and steel screws in CT, 1.5T and 3T MR images of the tibial Pilon: a quantitative assessment in 3D. Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. 2014;4(3). doi:10.3978/j.issn.2223-4292.2014.03.06

52. Alghamdi SA. Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents in Pregnant Women: A Literature Review of MRI Safety. Cureus. 15(5):e38493. doi:10.7759/cureus.38493

53. Radiology (ACR) RS of NA (RSNA) and AC of. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) - Head. Radiologyinfo.org. Accessed July 3, 2025. https://www.radiologyinfo.org/en/info/mri-brain

54. Williams JM, Hilmes MA, Archer B, et al. Repeatability and Reproducibility of Pancreas Volume Measurements Using MRI. Sci Rep. 2020;10:4767. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-61759-9

55. Gruber B, Froeling M, Leiner T, et al. RF coils: A practical guide for nonphysicists. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018;48(3):590-604. doi:10.1002/jmri.26187

56. MRI scan. NHS inform. Accessed July 3, 2025. https://www.nhsinform.scot/tests-and-treatments/scans-and-x-rays/mri-scan/

57. Recommendations | Familial breast cancer: classification, care and managing breast cancer and related risks in people with a family history of breast cancer | Guidance | NICE. June 25, 2013. Accessed July 23, 2025. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg164/chapter/recommendations

58. Lowry KP, Lee JM, Kong CY, et al. Annual Screening Strategies in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Gene Mutation Carriers: A Comparative Effectiveness Analysis. Cancer. 2012;118(8):2021-2030. doi:10.1002/cncr.26424

59. Lim EJ, Leung C, Pitman A, et al. Magnetic resonance colonography for colorectal cancer screening in patients with Lynch syndrome gene mutation. Fam Cancer. 2010;9(4):555-561. doi:10.1007/s10689-010-9350-9

60. Kim DH, Choi SH, Shim JH, et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Surveillance of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021;11(9):1665. doi:10.3390/diagnostics11091665

61. Ali MU, Hussain SJ, Khalid M, et al. MRI-Driven Alzheimer’s Disease Diagnosis Using Deep Network Fusion and Optimal Selection of Feature. Bioengineering (Basel). 2024;11(11):1076. doi:10.3390/bioengineering11111076

62. Your child is having an MRI or CT scan under sedation. GOSH Hospital site. Accessed July 23, 2025. https://www.gosh.nhs.uk/conditions-and-treatments/procedures-and-treatments/your-child-having-mri-scan-under-sedation/

63. Alorainy IA, Albadr FB, Abujamea AH. Attitude towards MRI safety during pregnancy. Ann Saudi Med. 2006;26(4):306-309. doi:10.5144/0256-4947.2006.306

64. Baykara Ulusan M, Ferrara F, Meltem E, et al. MRI-only breast cancers are less aggressive than cancers identifiable on conventional imaging. European Journal of Radiology. 2024;181:111781. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111781

65. Rahman WT, Gerard S, Grundlehner P, et al. Outcomes of High-Risk Breast MRI Screening in Women Without Prior History of Breast Cancer: Effectiveness Data from a Tertiary Care Center. J Breast Imaging. 2024;6(1):53-63. doi:10.1093/jbi/wbad092

66. Fields BKK, Joe BN. Screening Breast MRI Effectively Detects Early-Stage Breast Cancer in High-Risk Patients without Prior History of Breast Cancer. Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2024;6(2):e249005. doi:10.1148/rycan.249005

67. Nair A, Ong W, Lee A, et al. Enhancing Radiologist Productivity with Artificial Intelligence in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI): A Narrative Review. Diagnostics. 2025;15(9):1146. doi:10.3390/diagnostics15091146

68. Din M, Daga K, Saoud J, et al. Clinicians’ perspectives on the use of artificial intelligence to triage MRI brain scans. European Journal of Radiology. 2025;183:111921. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.111921

69. Balchandani P, Naidich TP. Ultra-High-Field MR Neuroimaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(7):1204-1215. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4180

70. Trattnig S, Springer E, Bogner W, et al. Key clinical benefits of neuroimaging at 7 T. Neuroimage. 2018;168:477-489. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.031

71. Kwee RM, Kwee TC. Whole‐body MRI for preventive health screening: A systematic review of the literature. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;50(5):1489-1503. doi:10.1002/jmri.26736